The tech behemoths Amazon, Microsoft & Google are established players in one of the battes that will change the future of customers view and investments of computing. This is an area with a potential hundred billion dollars plus that can be secured for the vendors – a lucrative space that each one wants to corner : the cloud. For a quick recap of the dollars under consideration - read here. Cloud lets business tap on demand the processing, storage and software over the web. Tall, powerful and cool servers with gargantuan memory onboard installed inside enterprises now are gradually giving way to tap on need model –use when needed and shut them down in other times. The vast data centers and governance brought in by these tech behemoths make them ideal partners for business to tap such services on a need to have basis – whenever and wherever required.
Amazon is by far the well-established leader here with a revenue that far exceeds the combined revenue of all competitors put together. Amazon partly achieved this by bringing a single-minded focus to this space to scale up and win and it paid back handsomely. Amazon’s first-mover advantage coupled with slow reactions from competition has now made Amazon an almost insurmountable lead in business in this space. That’s the focus and attention of the next two players. Microsoft has been pushing Azure extensively last 2-3 years and clocking impressive success. The lesser known of the trio in this space – Google is now flexing its muscle and is now focused on striking it big here.
Google is recognized primarily as the early proponent of cloud computing – after all, Google built huge date centers in its early days and ran services like search, gmail and maps , available around the world and with unthinkable scale in action. Alongside, developers build other applications on top resulting in an expanding google universe. Google has the strong reputation of running scalable, secure services and recognized as one delivering successfully for a long time. By being late and remaining indifferent to this space, Google lost out on big time opportunities that were out there and Amazon happily grabbed these. Now, Google wants to get back aggressively and be counted as large player in this space and is increasing its investments, market messaging and outreach efforts. Last week the company hosted an event to talk about their upcoming plans around the Google cloud platform and talk loudly about some notable success that they have notched thus far. I listened to the webcast and followed the announcements keenly to see how Google is planning to move things here and I heard good actionable things.
Google’s overall messaging shows that the momentum in the business continues and the focus to scale this platform with enterprise as a key segment to focus on for adoption. Google positioning is getting better to take a sizable chunk of business in the ever growing public cloud space over the next few years. The overall market is projected to have 50% of the enterprise workloads moved into overtime. Google paraded customers/customer stories – the likes of Spotify, Coca-Cola, Disney etc. as proof of successful adoption of their services.
The emphasis on a move forward basis is positioned around:
A. Machine learning as a cornerstone of their approach and hence drive the attendant benefits for customers.
B. Monetization/Commercialization of native security tools used within Google to make these available to customers.
C. Make ease of deployment and migration more easy.
In terms of upcoming innovation, consistent with its focus on enterprise adoption, Google talked about the lofty vision of No-ops goal for enterprises. This will be an ideal demonstration of the power of cloud computing and if Google and others are able to make it happen everywhere, it’s a true sign of the changed paradigm here.Another important facet of the evolution of the cloud revolved around the extreme emphasis on machine learning and the Google cloud platform’s leverage of this. A new product called Tensorflow has been open sourced by Google and it is their core belief that embracing machine learning will become a non-negotiable for innovative startups focused on scaling globally and offering sophisticated services.Add into the mix cloud monitoring tools working across clouds – enterprises can hardly resist massive cloud adoption with these. And in order to keep helping enterprises adopt and scale faster, Google wants to focus on the three important aspects of cloud computing – data centers, security and containers.
I drilled into these a little more to find what could be differentiated in offering such services and what I could recollect from the conference webcast included the following, which Google finds as the drivers for increasing enterprise adoption of their services.
1. Better value: GCP can cost up to 50% less than competitors. Google provides automatic discounts as customers consume higher volumes. And GCP also offers custom machine types (i.e., cores or gigabytes), which helps save customers versus static instance types from other vendors that often lead to overprovisioning.
2. Accelarate innovation: Google’s approach here is to allow customers to run applications with no additional operations staff needed. For example, Google showcases Snapchat here - grew from zero to 100mn users without hiring an operations team (just two people).
3. Risk Management : Google shall be focused on providing best-in-class security for customer’s data and digital assets, protect privacy and help in conforming to compliance and regulatory needs.
4. Open Source adoption –leading to better management by customers for products like Kubernotes( focused on managing data containers).
I got the feeling that the GCP was comparable to Amazon’s fabled AWS services for the purpose of enterprise adoption. While the engineering and under the hoods battle is one part of the equation, the real determinant of success and also ran lay in shaping market forces – GTM, Solutions, Partnerships, support and ease of doing business – an area that Google will have to heavily focus on. With Google’s stated plans to triple their data center regions and with some good early demonstrated success, the market should begin to warm up for Google.Enterprise success depends not just on what’s available from a service provider – determination of what and how to move to cloud, transforming IT landscape, flipping over the governance model and change management – all these have a say in the eventual success of any cloud initiative. With substantial progress and focus on this space with the tech giants competing aggressively for their pie in this fast growing space, the competition expands the market, services get more sophisticated and yet mature fast and the industry improves and courtesy of Moore’s effect, the customers get superior services at a lower cost. It’s a win-win situation for all.
Over the weekend, I finished reading the recently released Microsoft paper on the “Economics of the cloud”. As I head to Denver today for participating in the defragpanel on the impact of cloud computing in the enterprise irregulars track, I just wanted to share some thoughts on the theme which I want to discuss while at the conference both on and off the stage.
The Microsoft paper starts by connecting the dots between technology, economics, and disruption:
Economics are a powerful force in shaping industry transformations. Today‘s discussions on the cloud focus a great deal on technical complexities and adoption hurdles. While we acknowledge that such concerns exist and are important, historically, underlying economics have a much stronger impact on the direction and speed of disruptions, as technological challenges are resolved or overcome through the rapid innovation we‘ve grown accustomed to….
The pressures on IT & the engulfing sense of change in the IT landscape are hard to overlook. The pressures would mean more business begin to seriously look at SaaS, re-negotiating license terms, focusing on rapid adoption of virtualization etc. As part of this and beyond, internal IT would be forced more and more to show more bang for the buck and it is my view that organizations would begin to look more and more to question committed costs and begin to aggressively look at attacking them more systematically – earlier sporadic efforts marked their endeavors. This could also unlock additional resources that could potentially go towards funding new initiatives. There are enough number of enterprises going this route and their service partners are also in some cases prodding them to go this way.The emergence of cloud services is again fundamentally shifting the economics of IT. Cloud technology standardizes and pools IT resources and automates many of the maintenance tasks done manually today. Cloud architectures facilitate elastic consumption, self-service, and pay-as-you-go pricing.
The paper starts by highlighting that the basis for the economic advantage in the cloudosphere is the economy of scale available to cloud computing data centers. The paper identifies three areas of scale advantage:
1. Supply-side savings: Owing to scale, Cloud data centers have lower costs per server.
2. Demand-side aggregation: By aggregation, cloud can support an intermix of tenants and therefore directly contributing to higher server utilization rates ( this would be definitely higher than what can be achieved with single-tenant data centers).
3. Multi-tenancy efficiency: Hosting multiple tenants brings administrative cost overheads, and lowers server cost per tenant and by extension cost per data center user goes down.
On the demand side of things, the story is complementary and drives similar conclusions. By aggregating volume of compute usage, cloud service providers enable users to smooth out peaks and valleys. The contention here is that by pumping up large server volumes, corresponding increase in utilization can be achieved and this has the effect of reducing operational costs. Now extend this scenario : cloud service providers can potentially run a number of data centers while administratively support them through centralized NOCs, with the results the costs can get further spread across.
The paper notes,"public clouds are in a relatively early stage of development, so naturally critical areas like reliability and security will continue to improve. Data already suggests that public cloud email is more reliable than most on-premises implementations". In concluding the section on economies of scale, the white paper goes on to state that economies of scale are so significant that the TCO calculated server wise of a 100K server data center is 80% lower than that of a 1K server data center. While there are legitimate opportunities for a set of customers to pursue private cloud in certain periods of time in their cloud journey, strong indicators suggest that over time the cloud efforts would begin to coalesce around the public cloud given significant computing economic advantages – these need to be to be recognized, and in the process of this journey, vital concerns regarding security and reliability will get addressed (gradually melt away) thus feeding the momentum into the public cloud journey.
Clearly economics will begin to weigh its hand if the cost advantage of public cloud over the private ones are of the order of 10X as the paper seems to suggest . The paper also suggests that any SMB would be crazy to factor on-premise or private cloud into their future strategy when these options are going to cost up to 40x more than public cloud alternatives. I would love to see the complete data points on which the benefits have been quantified and inferences drawn - this will be very useful in advancing the body of knowledge and state of practice of cloud adoption inside enterprises. Lets examine from an organization standpoint : As I wrote earlier, setting up private cloud is a motherhood statement at best( in many organizational surveys, one can find setting private clouds is not in the CIO’s top three priorities – if anything virtualization finds a place-) to make this happen in a credible way means re-examining most parts of IT functioning and business –IT relationship inside enterprises. IT teams while conceptualizing private clouds are happy to retain existing architectural designs, happily propose a clasical DMZ/Perimeterized model for providing security and enabling access, too often leveraging a highly virtualized infrastructure. More often than not, it’s enabling virtualization, automation and self service and color it as private cloud. Do recognize the implicit differences in constructing a private cloud and a public cloud. Comfort with the status quo with some adjustments versus an opportunity to rethink architecture, security, privacy,compliance needs in a way summarizes the nature of thought process and expected results between the private and public clouds. Speaking more directly, public clouds present the opportunity for enterprises to review and achieve specific requirements in the areas like agility, flexibility and efficiency at optimal effort Versus a skewed , boxed implementation of private cloud setup. Taking advantage of the public cloud benefits would far outweigh the advantages of getting boxed inside with private clouds.
Most elements of the bedrock gets affected – the processes, culture, metrics, performance, funding, service levels etc. Well thought out frameworks, roadmaps need to be put in place to make this transition successful. These frameworks need to cater not only to setting up internal cloud but eventually help in embracing the public cloud over the years- not an easy task as it appears. A few of those organizations that master this transition may also look at making business out of these – so it’s a journey – that needs to be travelled onto embracing public clouds. Some business may take a staged approach and call it by private cloud, internal cloud or whatever but eventually the road may lead into public clouds!
I read with interest that observers of Oracle Open World 2010 brought out while reviewing the agenda : Oracle executive vice president Thomas Kurian's keynote was originally scheduled to showcase Fusion apps, but will now be all about "Oracle and Cloud Computing" and his company's role in the cloud "throughout the application lifecycle—from development and deployment to management and self-service administration. . . . Oracle's cloud solution spans all layers of the cloud, including infrastructure as a service (IaaS), platform as a service (PaaS), and applications or software as a service (SaaS), and this keynote focuses on how Oracle products enable cloud computing." Am headed later this evening,to Mascone to listen to Larry Ellison talk about the much delayed and much awaited Fusion Apps launch besides others like Exadata, Java, MySql and ofcourse about Mark Hurd.
There are compelling reasons for both large and medium-sized enterprises to be interested in cloud computing. For medium-sized companies, the top reason they are looking at cloud computing is that it's so much faster and cheaper to get started. Medium-sized companies may not have sophisticated IT departments nor the money to invest in upfront capital expenses, so using a public cloud provider may be very attractive. For larger companies, using an external cloud vendor may enable small teams or departments to get a new application or a development/test environment running in minutes instead of months. The self-service aspect of public clouds means that small teams can avoid a long wait for IT departments to approve project requests, procure servers, find room for them in the data center, install software, configure software, etc. Also, some applications have a limited lifespan of a few weeks or months, perhaps for a marketing campaign, event or special project. Pay-for-use and being able to return IT resources to the pool is perfect for these situations. Some enterprises, especially larger ones with economies of scale, are implementing "private clouds" for their own exclusive use. Large enterprises are interested in building their own private cloud to get the agility, efficiency and quality of service advantages of cloud computing, while mitigating concerns about public clouds, such as security, compliance, performance, reliability, vendor lock-in and long-term costs.
While we assess cloud adoption inside enterprises, we can overlook the fact that there really is a perfect storm in IT. Cloud computing, open source and Enterprise 2.0 are complementary technology shifts that threaten incumbant vendors, offer innovation & cost benefit opportunities (&risk) while challenging IT. It may be more profound than the introduction of PCs or Web 1.0 in business.
While I mull over all these topics, I was just seeing the state of adoption of Cloud/SaaS and the mindset amo0ngst enterprise buyers in moving to the new model. While I have written about how the cloud will disrupt all the stakeholders here, here and here, I wanted to look at the inhibiting factors for cloud adoption inside enterprises and what can be done about it.
Survey after survey lists key adoption concerns of users revolving around, legacy environments –stakeholder interests –in terms of ownership, governance ,legacy environments –protecting investments, Status quo maintenance in respect of leagacy apps – why tinker with it if its performing at acceptable levels. In many places, IT and Business are thoroughly underprepared to do the generation climb – they may have to revisit all the important decisions that they have lived woth in respect of system of records, security practices, integration mechanisms, business rules and process orchestrations, master data management etc. Revisiting all these things would call for mammoth preparation from IT and Business . Arguably, this is a very overwhelming proposition for IT inside enterprises. Business would tend to believe this move into clouds/SaaS may simplify their operations but in reality expectations may be overrunning reality and with the result the list of needs keep expanding adding to the burden on cloud/SaaS adoption.
Business need to look at their portfolio and arrive at a right solution that fits their need, Oracle with its very rich and highly capable consulting and system integration partners can help customers work through this terrain towards adopting Cloud/SaaS model starting from planning, contracting, migration approaches, implementation, integration and ongoing support. But,what Ellison announces today would be very important as it will in many ways shape enterprise adoption of cloud.Oracle is a profoundly influential force in the market today, and the strategies it pursues and the positions that it takes and its view on the ecosystem influences everybody across all those constituent sets of customers and prospects and partners and stakeholders and, perhaps most of all, competitors. Through various public announcements, Oracle has indicated that Fusion Applications' technical underpinnings, which include Oracle Fusion Middleware and the JDeveloper toolkit, may result in change for many users of Oracle's existing ERP (enterprise resource planning) products, which include JD Edwards, PeopleSoft and E-Business Suite. In terms of commercials, Oracle has indicated that Fusion Applications will obviously be sold in on-premises form as well as via hosting services like Oracle's own On Demand division, But it may be up to partners to deliver the software as true multi-tenant SaaS, which provides cost savings and cuts management chores, since multiple customers share the same application instance. Oracle has indicated in the past that upgrades could be “'like-for-like” meaning, if customers are upgrading from [E-Business Suite] financials to Fusion financials that should be a no-cost upgrade. But if it's a new module, that will be additional cost.
So far Oracle has revealed its cloud computing approach in three parts: 1. If you want an internal, or private, cloud, Oracle will sell you the hardware and/or middleware to build it. 2. If you want to use Oracle’s software on a third-party cloud, Oracle supports Amazon Web Services and Rackspace Cloud today, and will support other clouds in the future. 3. If you want to rent rather than own Oracle’s business applications, Oracle will provide those apps under a hosted subscription model.
This calls for too much of IT assembly and what’s needed is multitenant solutions across the oracle platform with a clearly articulated strategy . Rolling out more SaaS products is a good start point that will help simplify Oracle's offerings for customers. But Oracle also needs to define packages of its hardware and software components - similar to IBM’s notion of a “cloud in a box” and/or Microsoft’s Business Productivity Online Suite (BPOS). I am also keen to find out how much across the stack Oracle intends to support external products say DB2 or other virtualization platforms. All eyes are on what Larry will announce about Oracle’s cloud strategy tonight and the various cloud sessions planned in the next three days.
From information made available so far, What I see is that Oracle's strategy on public clouds remain very hazy( may be it is emerging or kept as a top secret pending an announcement in the session tonight), while their partners are Iaas/Paas partners are seen more of an additional channel. While private and hybrid cloud look to be a good starting point for enterprises to adopt, I see that the destination may be to have federated clouds and fully embracing public clouds. Also transitions to private clouds, may not be so easy as one tends to believe before venturing into the journey. Oracle's cloud approach needs to provide answers to these scenarios. I will be there talking to Oracle to find out more answers.
It's often widely acknowledged that all players in the software ecosystem needs to make adjustments and put efforts to embrace the world of cloud. We saw in the earlier posts the nature of issues that need to be confronted by buyers, IT service providers/Outsourcing firms, internal IT . Now lets look at some issues to be faced by other important stakeholders in the cloud ecosytem - software providers & infrastructure service providers.
One of the paradoxes in the software world is that despite being of the high technology genre, software performance have always provided room for improvement and the established order here is to keep improving performance over time. It's a comfortable spot that vendors and buyers always seemed to have settled in. In some cases, performance issues were always a toss between software, consulting firms, IT infrastructure, Internal IT, business processes etc.. Now comes the world of cloud. A near uniform experience at the core level is what’s getting promised by the service providers. In the current on premise IT World, it’s common to see Enterprise this play out all the time : IT managers buy commercial software packages and involve integrators to deliver software solutions and mostly they find that hardware consumption overshoots original plans- so they are forced to invest more in hardware and the process of taking such decisions happen late in the implementation cycle and this introduces more delay and hence the project costs tend to go significantly up,coupled as these are with some related issues forcing more delays.
It's a common knowledge,that many system integrators lack sufficient depth in creating a good enterprise architecture, in time for an engagement and configurations take multiple cycles to deliver an acceptable level of performance. Why did I earlier call such a painful experience as something that all players are comfortable in accepting? Lets look at this. Performance issues that needed to be fixed by the software vendor invariably gets pushed to the next release/version ,while they hype and sell the current release. When software performance trailed expectation by some percentage points, the common belief was that enterprise data centers are underutilised and therefore the excess capacity would take care in bridging the performance gap. Buyers couldn’t care less. It was cheaper and easier to simply throw hardware at the problem rather than to worry about either performance optimization in software, or proper hardware architecture and tuning.
Now the world of cloud/SaaS brings this issue squarely to the table back again. Cloud/SaaS turns that equation around sharply, whether multi-tenant or hosted single tenant. Now, the Cloud/SaaS vendor is responsible for all the operational costs, and therefore the Cloud/SaaS vendor is compelled to look at all levers that can help drive better performance to pay attention to performance, as costs become more directly measurable by them.
Now in such a rapidly changing scenario, what needs to happen? Today, we see traditional ISV’s moving fast to offer their software in the cloud/SaaS model. They typically start in a single tenant model ( We need to recognise that despite multi tenant model being the better one in terms of capacity utilization and for lowering operational costs), ISV’s tell me (and I tend to believe them here),developing multi-tenant software could be way expensive to develop. Its equally an investment intense effort to move a product from single tenant model into multi tenant model. (The theme is identical for businesses running software in their own data centers). It has to be recognised that software organizations are made up for creating software and not focused on benefiting out of investments in new delivery models or in offering consulting to customers for implementation( That product companies show significant revenue stream out of their consulting and services need to be discussed separately - perhaps in a different post altogether)
Coming back to the point of discussion, in such a scenario of product organizations getting focused on software development, businesses that are focussed on performance optimizations prioritized for the hosted model gets a new face of recognition. As a result, there is, and will continue to be, a significant market for infrastructure solutions that can help regular ISVs offer a SaaS model in a cost effective way without having to significantly retool their software.
Lets step back for a moment and see this : For a long time, hosting companies have been integrators of technology, not developers of technology. Today the forces of change are so powerful, they are increasingly pushing hosting companies into being software developers — they become a new niche in software development paradigm -they act as companies who create competitive advantage in significant part by creating software which is used to deliver capabilities to customers. Tools aimed at creating optimised multi-tenant model and delivered as a cloud service - these now become part of infrastructure players - Iaas. The more sophisticated and mature of the lot progress to become platform-as-a-service player(Paas).Many mistakenly think, IaaS players as focusing just on hiring boxes and having them hosted inside data centers and offer them as a rented service.Today, IaaS is now transforming into a software business, with the focus and mission on creating new software methods and tools aimed at introducing new features and capabilities to embrace Cloud/SaaS. Service and Support would be important functions for them while they step in to provide additional support to the software developers in the Cloud/SaaS ecosystem. For the skeptics, my answer is look at the players in the IaaS world, study their antecedents and one will recognize what am trying to say. This is one part of the axiom - the business model is the most disruptive change in cloud computing - not just the technology per se!
An interesting thread is now on within the enterprise irregulars group on what constitutes private clouds –as again very enlightened discussion therein. The issue that I want to talk about is if private cloud do indeed exist, then what is their adoption path ? Lets start from the beginning : the issue is can we can use the term ”cloud” for describing the changes that happen inside IT architectures within enterprise? Thought there can be no definitive answer – a series of transition to a new order of things, will in my opinion, become imminent.
The pressures on IT & the engulfing sense of change in the IT landscape are hard to overlook. The pressures would mean more business begin to seriously look at SaaS, re-negotiating license terms, focusing on rapid adoption of virtualization etc. As part of this and beyond, internal IT would be forced more and more to show more bang for the buck and it is my view that organizations would begin to look more and more to question committed costs and begin to aggressively look at attacking them more systematically – earlier sporadic efforts marked their endeavors. This could also unlock additional resources that could potentially go towards funding new initiatives. There are enough number of enterprises going this route and their service partners are also in some cases prodding them to go this way.
The change in many senses may make IT inside enterprises to look , behave and perform like cloud computing providers – though there would be limitations( in most places serious) on scale, usage assessments , security and the like. There are strong incentives propelling enterprises to channel their efforts and investments over the next few years in mimicking a private cloud service architecture that gets managed by them internally. This could well become their approach of staging towards finally embracing the cloud(public) over a period of time . These baby steps to nearly full blown efforts are needed in preparing organizations to embrace clouds and it may not be feasible at all to make the shift from on-premise to cloud like flip switch. Serious licensing issues, maturity, lack of readiness, integration concerns, security all come in the way of enterprises looking at public cloud in a holistic way. These steps need not be looked down – they would very well become the foundation to move into public clouds in a big way.
Let’s for a moment assess this theme from a security perspective - a dominant concern business expresses when it comes to clouds. While assessing security requirements in public clouds,we see the recognition that a whole host of chnages need to be done at application architecture levels, the need to accomodate specific compliance requirements, privacy provisions in the public cloud etc.
Lets think through this : setting up private cloud is a motherhood statement at best( in many organizational surveys, one can find setting private clouds is not in the CIO’s top three priorities – if anything virtualization finds a place-) to make this happen in a credible way means re-examining most parts of IT functioning and business –IT relationship inside enterprises. IT teams while conceptualizing private clouds are happy to retain existing architectural designs, happily propose a clasical DMZ/Perimeterized model for providing security and enabling access, too often leveraging a highly virtualized infrastructure. More often than not, it’s enabling virtualization, automation and self service and color it as private cloud. Do recognize the implicit differences in constructing a private cloud and a public cloud. Comfort with the status quo with some adjustments versus an opportunity to rethink architecture, security, privacy,compliance needs in a way summarizes the nature of thought process and expected results between the private and public clouds. Speaking more directly, public clouds present the opportunity for enterprises to review and achieve specific requirements in the areas like agility, flexibility and efficiency at optimal effort Versus a skewed , boxed implementation of private cloud setup. Taking advantage of the public cloud benefits would far outweigh the advantages of getting boxed inside with private clouds.
Most elements of the bedrock gets affected – the processes, culture, metrics, performance, funding, service levels etc. Well thought out frameworks, roadmaps need to be put in place to make this transition successful. These frameworks need to cater not only to setting up internal cloud but eventually help in embracing the public cloud over the years- not an easy task as it appears. A few of those organizations that master this transition may also look at making business out of these – so it’s a journey – that needs to be travelled onto embracing public clouds. Some business may take a staged approach and call it by private cloud, internal cloud or whatever but eventually the road may lead into public clouds!
An interesting thread is now on within the enterprise irregulars group on what constitutes private clouds –as again very enlightened discussion therein. The issue that I want to talk about is if private cloud do indeed exist, then what is their adoption path ? Lets start from the beginning : the issue is can we can use the term ”cloud” for describing the changes that happen inside IT architectures within enterprise? Thought there can be no definitive answer – a series of transition to a new order of things, will in my opinion, become imminent.
The pressures on IT & the engulfing sense of change in the IT landscape are hard to overlook. The The pressures would mean more begin to seriously look at SaaS, re-negotiating license terms, rapid adoption of virtualization etc. As part of this and beyond, internal IT would be forced more and more to show more bang for the buck and it is my view that organizations would begin to look more and more to question committed costs and begin to aggressively look at attacking them more systematically – earlier sporadic efforts marked their endeavors. This could also unlock additional resources that could potentially go towards funding new initiatives. There are enough number of enterprises going this route and their service partners are also in some cases prodding them to go this way.
The change in many senses may make IT inside enterprises to look , behave and perform like cloud computing providers – though there would be limitations( in most places serious) on scale, usage assessments , security and the like. There are strong incentives propelling enterprises to channel their efforts and investments over the next few years in mimicking a private cloud service architecture that gets managed by them internally. This could well become their approach of staging towards finally embracing the cloud(public) over a period of time . These baby steps to nearly full blown efforts are needed in preparing organizations to embrace clouds and it may not be feasible at all to make the shift from on-premise to cloud like flip switch. Serious licensing issues, maturity, lack of readiness, integration concerns, security all come in the way of enterprises looking at public cloud in a holistic way. These steps need not be looked down – they would very well become the foundation to move into public clouds in a big way.
Lets think through this : setting up private cloud is a motherhood statement at best( in many organizational surveys, one can find setting private clouds is not in the CIO’s top three priorities – if anything virtualization finds a place-) to make this happen in a credible way means re-examining most parts of IT functioning and business –IT relationship inside enterprises. Most elements of the bedrock gets affected – the processes, culture, metrics, performance, funding, service levels etc. Well thought out frameworks, roadmaps need to be put in place to make this transition successful. These frameworks need to cater not only to setting up internal cloud but eventually help in embracing the public cloud over the years- not an easy task as it appears. A few of those organizations that master this transition may also look at making business out of these – so it’s a journey – that needs to be travelled onto embracing public clouds. Some business may take a staged approach and call it by private cloud, internal cloud or whatever but eventually the road may lead into public clouds!
Sadagopan's Weblog on Emerging Technologies, Trends,Thoughts, Ideas & Cyberworld "All views expressed are my personal views are not related in any way to my employer"
