$BlogRSDUrl$>
Cloud, Digital, SaaS, Enterprise 2.0, Enterprise Software, CIO, Social Media, Mobility, Trends, Markets, Thoughts, Technologies, Outsourcing
Contact
Contact Me:
sadagopan@gmail.com
Linkedin
Facebook
Twitter
Google Profile
Search
www
This Blog
Resources
Mckinseyquarterly
Strategy + Business
Sandhill Group
CIOInsight
Seth Godin
Om Malik
Enterprise Irregulars
Lens360
Cloud Ave
Enterprise Irregulars
Tom Foremski
Labels
Enter your email address below to subscribe to this
Blog
!
powered by Bloglet
online
Archives
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
February 2009
March 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
October 2011
January 2012
September 2012
November 2012
February 2014
September 2014
October 2014
March 2015
April 2015
June 2015
March 2016
September 2017
September 2020
July 2021
August 2023
October 2023
November 2023
December 2023
February 2024
March 2024
May 2024
August 2024
Monday, May 24, 2004
Going Public Without Profits or a Product? Yes, in 2004 via NYTimes
Nanosys Inc., a company in Palo Alto, Calif., filed a public offering statement hoping to raise up to $115 million. Unlike Google Inc., its Silicon Valley neighbor that is also going public, Nanosys has no profits and no products to sell, and its filing statement said it would not market any products before 2006.Nanosys has more than 200 patents and patent applications as well as product development ventures with big companies like Intel and DuPont. The company, founded in 2001, has ties to some of the world's leading nanotech researchers, and promotes its technology as a building block for products as diverse as solar energy panels, electronic displays and memory chips
Still, a hot reception for the Nanosys public offering is likely to lift all companies in nanotechnology. Companies selling themselves could probably seek a higher price and those raising money from venture capitalists may be able to command better terms. And if the dot-com era is any guide, success of Nanosys will accelerate the trend of companies sticking the "nano" prefix in their names or associating themselves with the field in advertising.some experts like Vinod Khosla, a partner at the venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, have been arguing that such a correction is overdue because too many venture capitalists have been piling into the field of Nanotechnology.
It is a strange world indeed - while there are a lot of expectations in terms of advances by using nanotechnology, the funding of such firms is still ridden with doubts and difficulties.
|
ThinkExist.com Quotes
Sadagopan's Weblog on Emerging Technologies, Trends,Thoughts, Ideas & Cyberworld
"All views expressed are my personal views are not related in any way to my employer"